Skip to main content
GxP-compliant eBR workflows with less review and change effort - Hintergrundbild

GxP-compliant eBR workflows with less review and change effort

Compliance by design for QA, without losing operational flexibility. For Quality Assurance, CSV and responsible roles in regulated production environments.

Our References

Andreas Nicklas, Managing Director, anic GmbH

Especially in validated environments, digitization itself is rarely the problem - the real issue is the lack of changeability afterwards.

Andreas Nicklas in the PHPRO interview
From bottleneck to change routine

Experience from regulated production environments:

  • Implementation of GxP-related IT systems in pharma and chemicals
  • Audit-ready digital evidence chains instead of paper-based documentation
  • Practical solutions for QA, CSV and GMP stakeholders

The QA challenge

  • High manual review effort for paper-based batch documentation
  • Unstructured data makes review by exception difficult
  • Changes to manufacturing processes trigger new validation cycles
  • Traceability and evidence chains are time-consuming to establish

The solution: anicomply for QA & GMP

anicomply supports GxP requirements through compliance by design.

Audit trail, eSignatures, versioning and four-eyes principle are integral components - not add-ons introduced afterwards.

Your benefits for QA

QA requirement With anicomply
TraceabilityComplete digital evidence chain
High review effortReview by exception
Complex changesControllable changes
Validation pressureReduced revalidation effort
Audit stressBetter auditability

Key QA value points

  • Compliance by design instead of compliance as additional effort
  • Structured digital data instead of confusing documents
  • Review by exception for more efficient batch release
  • Manageable changes even during validated operation

Typical QA scenarios

  • Electronic batch documentation (EBR)
  • Review and release processes
  • Audit preparation and execution
  • Changes to MBRs and workflows

IT and system landscape

  • Integration with ERP, MES and QMS systems
  • Web-based architecture
  • Cloud or on-premises
  • Reduced dependency on specialist resources